Search Index

Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Pinterest Copy link Can what we eat, breathe, and do for a living affect our Parkinson’s risk? Last updated: 21/03/25, 11:58 Published: 21/03/25, 11:29 New research suggests that the cause extends far beyond the nervous system Introduction Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the most prevalent movement disorder and the second most common neurodegenerative disorder worldwide. PD is best known for causing tremors and stiffness, but it’s much more than a movement disorder. It also affects mood and speech. While PD is caused by the loss of dopamine-producing neurons in the brain’s substantia nigra, new research suggests that its roots may extend far beyond the nervous system. Surprisingly, the gut microbiome – trillions of bacteria living in our digestive tract – may play a key role in both the development and prevention of PD. These microbes help regulate inflammation and support brain health by influencing microglia, the brain’s immune cells. Diet also seems to matter: a Mediterranean-style diet rich in fruits, vegetables, and healthy fats appears to lower PD risk, while smoking – despite its well-known dangers – has been linked to a puzzling protective effect, possibly due to nicotine’s impact on the brain. Meanwhile, specific jobs, like farming, may increase PD risk due to pesticide exposure, which has been associated with neurodegeneration. The idea that what we eat, breathe, and do for a living could shape our brain health is intriguing. As research continues to uncover these surprising links, it raises an important question: could simple lifestyle changes help protect against neurodegenerative diseases? Gut-Brain Axis The gut-brain axis (GBA) is a two-way communication network between the enteric nervous system of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and the central nervous system, connecting emotions and cognition with the intestines’ functions. This involves the brain sending signals to the gut and vice versa, which happens through the vagus nerve, gut hormones and the gut microbiome, which can produce chemicals to impact brain activity. This usually explains why stress signals from the brain can influence the digestion of food, causing symptoms such as stomach pain, bloating or changes in bowel movements. Alternatively, signals travelling from the gut to the brain can be seen when we eat something that makes us feel sick – we naturally avoid that food and the place where we ate it. Gut dysbiosis can be triggered by multiple factors, including diet, antibiotic use, infection, inflammation, and chronic stress. Dysbiosis is the imbalance in the composition and activity of the microbiota (microorganisms present in the gut). It is considered a risk factor for PD, but is not a direct cause of it. Changes in the microbiota can induce metabolic changes, which can result in increased local and systemic inflammation in addition to increased permeability of the intestines, making the gut ‘leaky’. Additionally, this can cause increased harmful gut bacteria (such as E. coli or Salmonella ) as they leak through the intestinal lining, producing amyloid proteins which can travel to the brain and cause the accumulation of α-synuclein – a protein linked to neurodegenerative diseases such as PD. There is also a reduction in healthy gut bacteria – which usually produce short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) such as butyrate – which reduce inflammation and protect the brain cells. Less SCFAs cause an increase in inflammation and loss of the neuroprotective effects of SCFAs. Increased inflammation can eventually cause the weakening of the gut lining and a cycle of worsening dysbiosis, increased inflammation and increased α-synuclein accumulation, which spreads to the brain. Furthermore, gut dysbiosis can decrease the efficacy of dopaminergic treatments, which may be used to treat PD. In gut dysbiosis, harmful bacteria can produce an enzyme called dopa-decarboxylase – which converts Levodopa (a drug used to treat PD) into dopamine within the intestines. Hence, less Levodopa reaches the bloodstream and the brain, where it primarily acts and is converted to dopamine. This results in less Levodopa being converted to dopamine within the brain, reducing the effectiveness of the treatment. Consequently, this leads to motor symptoms and impairments such as tremors, which is a characteristic symptom of PD. Can food protect the brain? Could your diet be influencing your brain health in ways you never imagined? Research suggests that what you eat might play a critical role in either protecting your brain from PD or increasing your risk. People who follow a Mediterranean diet (MD) – rich in olive oil, fish, fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and nuts – may have up to a 25% lower risk of developing PD. Interestingly, this protective effect appears stronger in younger individuals and those in the early stages of PD. So.. what makes the MD so powerful? Gut microbiome boost: the MD promotes beneficial gut bacteria while reducing harmful microbes, supporting overall brain health. Anti-inflammatory effects: fibre from plant-based foods fuels the gut microbiome, leading to the production of SCFAs, which reduce inflammation and may slow PD progression. Mitochondrial protection: compounds in the MD, such as polyphenols in olive oil and omega-3 fatty acids in fish, help repair and protect mitochondria – the powerhouses of our cells. This helps prevent brain cell damage and maintain dopamine function. Neural growth & repair: walnuts and omega-3s may support neuronal growth and reduce protein clumping, a hallmark of PD. On the other hand, a Western diet – high in processed foods, saturated fats, refined sugars, and excess salt – may increase the risk of developing and worsening PD symptoms. Foods commonly associated with faster PD progression include canned fruits and vegetables, soda, fried foods, beef, ice cream, and cheese. Why does this happen? Microbiome disruption: the Western diet fosters an imbalance in gut bacteria, leading to inflammation and potential brain damage. Gut leakiness and neuroinflammation: a diet high in unhealthy fats and low in fibre can damage the gut lining, allowing harmful substances to enter the bloodstream and trigger brain inflammation. Hormonal imbalance: key gut-derived hormones (GLP-1, GIP, and IGN) that help protect neurons are disrupted by poor diet but can be restored through healthier food choices. While diet alone cannot cure PD, growing evidence suggests it can modify the disease course. A diet rich in fibre, healthy fats, and plant-based foods supports gut health, reduces inflammation, and may protect neurons from degeneration. Understanding these diet-microbiome-brain interactions could open new doors to PD prevention and treatment – proving once again that food truly is medicine. The smoking paradox One of the most intriguing findings in PD research is that smokers appear to have a lower risk of developing the disease. Epidemiological studies consistently show that people who smoke are less likely to be diagnosed with PD compared to non-smokers. But why? Scientists believe that nicotine, a key compound in tobacco, may play a neuroprotective role by affecting dopamine-producing neurons – the same cells that are progressively lost in PD disease. Nicotine interacts with receptors in the brain that influence dopamine release, which could help protect these neurons from degeneration. However, clinical trials testing nicotine as a treatment for PD have not shown significant benefits, suggesting that other compounds in tobacco or alternative mechanisms might be involved. Some researchers propose that additional chemicals in cigarette smoke, such as monoamine oxidase inhibitors, antioxidants, or even carbon monoxide at low levels, might contribute to this protective effect. Others suggest that genetic factors or lifestyle differences between smokers and non-smokers could also explain the association. Despite this fascinating link, smoking is not a recommended strategy for preventing PD. The well-documented risks – including cancer, cardiovascular disease, and lung damage – far outweigh any potential benefit. Instead, scientists are investigating whether specific compounds found in tobacco could be harnessed for new treatments without the harmful effects of smoking itself. What about my job? Can your job affect your risk of developing PD? Some studies suggest that certain occupations – like farming – might increase the risk, while others find no clear connection. So, what’s the truth? Let’s break it down. Some research suggests that farmers are more likely to develop PD, possibly due to exposure to pesticides like paraquat and rotenone, which have been linked to brain cell damage. Additionally, heavy metals found in agricultural environments – such as lead and manganese – may contribute to brain inflammation and oxidative stress, both of which play a role in PD. Furthermore, certain metals, including iron, mercury, copper, and manganese, can build up in the brain over time. Scientists believe that long-term exposure could damage the neurons that produce dopamine. However, the exact link isn’t fully understood, and not everyone exposed to these metals develops PD. That said, not all studies agree. Some large-scale research has found no significant link between farming, pesticide exposure, heavy metals and PD risk. This means that while environmental factors might play a role, other things – like genetics, lifestyle, or how long and intensely someone is exposed – could be just as important. So.. should you worry? If you work in farming or are regularly exposed to pesticides and heavy metals, it might be a good idea to take precautions, like using protective equipment and following safety guidelines. However, more research is needed to fully understand how these exposures contribute to PD. For now, staying informed and taking steps to reduce unnecessary exposure to harmful chemicals is a smart approach. What can you do? While there’s no guaranteed way to prevent PD, research suggests that certain lifestyle choices may help reduce the risk. Here are some science-backed steps you can take: 1. Adopt a Mediterranean-style diet: eating a diet rich in whole, plant-based foods, healthy fats (like olive oil and nuts), and lean proteins has been linked to a lower risk of PD. The Mediterranean diet is packed with antioxidants and anti-inflammatory compounds that may help protect brain cells. 2. Stay active: regular exercise isn’t just good for your muscles and heart – it may also help maintain gut health and protect neurons. Activities like walking, swimming, or strength training have been associated with a reduced risk of PD and other neurodegenerative diseases. 3. Limit pesticide exposure: for those in agricultural or industrial settings, protective measures, such as wearing gloves and masks and following safety guidelines, can help reduce exposure to potentially harmful chemicals linked to PD. 4. Monitor gut health: emerging research suggests that the gut microbiome may play a key role in PD. While scientists are still exploring microbiome-targeted therapies, maintaining good gut health by eating fibre-rich foods, fermented foods (like yogurt and kimchi), and staying hydrated may support overall well-being. Conclusion The connection between diet, gut health, lifestyle, and PD is an exciting area of research. While we don’t yet have all the answers, it’s clear that healthy habits – such as eating well, staying active, and minimising harmful exposures – can support both brain and overall health. As science continues to uncover new insights, making informed choices today can help protect your well-being in the long run! Written by Joecelyn Kirani Tan, Hanin Salem, Devikka Sivashanmuganathan & Barayturk Aydin Related articles: TDP43 and Parkinsonism / Diabetes drug to treat Parkinson's REFERENCES Berthouzoz E, Lazarevic V, Zekeridou A, Castro M, Debove I, Aybek S, Schrenzel J, Burkhard PR, Fleury V. Oral and intestinal dysbiosis in Parkinson's disease. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2023 Nov;179(9):937-946. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2022.12.010. Epub 2023 Mar 16. PMID: 36934020. Bisaglia M. Mediterranean Diet and Parkinson's Disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Dec 20;24(1):42. doi: 10.3390/ijms24010042. PMID: 36613486; PMCID: PMC9820428. Firestone JA, Lundin JI, Powers KM, Smith-Weller T, Franklin GM, Swanson PD, Longstreth WT Jr, Checkoway H. Occupational factors and risk of Parkinson's disease: A population-based case-control study. Am J Ind Med. 2010 Mar;53(3):217-23. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20788. PMID: 20025075; PMCID: PMC3299410. Gorell JM, Johnson CC, Rybicki BA, Peterson EL, Richardson RJ. The risk of Parkinson's disease with exposure to pesticides, farming, well water, and rural living. Neurology. 1998 May;50(5):1346-50. doi: 10.1212/wnl.50.5.1346. PMID: 9595985. hms.harvard.edu . (2017). The Gut and the Brain. [online] Available at: https://hms.harvard.edu/news-events/publications-archive/brain/gut-brain . Hrncir, T. (2022). Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis: Triggers, Consequences, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Options. Microorganisms, [online] 10(3), p.578. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8954387/#:~:text=Dysbiosis%20can%20be%20caused%20by,food%20additives)%2C%20and%20hygiene .. Jackson A, Forsyth CB, Shaikh M, Voigt RM, Engen PA, Ramirez V, Keshavarzian A. Diet in Parkinson's Disease: Critical Role for the Microbiome. Front Neurol. 2019 Dec 10;10:1245. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01245. PMID: 31920905; PMCID: PMC6915094. Johns Hopkins Medicine (2025). Can Environmental Toxins Cause Parkinson’s Disease? https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/parkinsons-disease/can-environmental-toxins-cause-parkinson-disease Kwon, D. et al. (2024) ‘Diet and the gut microbiome in patients with parkinson’s disease’, npj Parkinson’s Disease , 10(1). doi:10.1038/s41531-024-00681-7. Physiopedia. (n.d.). Gut Brain Axis (GBA). [online] Available at: https://www.physio-pedia.com/Gut_Brain_Axis_(GBA) . Project Gallery

There’s Nothing Here... We can’t find the page you’re looking for. Check the URL, or head back home. Go Home

All Posts Check back soon Once posts are published, you’ll see them here.

Groups Sort by: Recent Activity All (1) My Groups Suggested Groups My Site 1 Group Public · 33 members Join

Search Index All (250) Other Pages (231) Forum Posts (19) 250 items found Other Pages (231) The dopamine connection | Scientia News Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Pinterest Copy link The dopamine connection How your gut influences your mood and behaviour Introduction to dopamine Dopamine is a neurotransmitter derived from an amino acid called phenylalanine, which must be obtained through the diet, through foods such as fish, meat, dairy and more. Dopamine is produced and released by dopaminergic neurons in the central nervous system and can be found in different brain regions. The neurotransmitter acts via two mechanisms: wiring transmission and volume transmission. In wiring transmission, dopamine is released to the synaptic cleft and acts on postsynaptic dopamine receptors. In volume transmission, extracellular dopamine arrives at neurons other than postsynaptic ones. Through methods such as diffusion, dopamine then reaches receptors in other neurons that are not in direct contact with the cell that has released the neurotransmitter. In both mechanisms, dopamine binds to the receptors, transmitting signals between neurons and affecting mood and behaviour. The link between dopamine and gut health Dopamine has been known to result in positive emotions, including pleasure, satisfaction and motivation, which can be influenced by gut health. Therefore, what you eat and other factors, including motivation, could impact your mood and behaviour. This was proven by a study (Hamamah et al., 2022), which looked at the bidirectional gut-brain connection. The study found that gut microbiota was important in maintaining the concentrations of dopamine via the gut-brain connection, also known as the gut microbiota-brain axis or vagal gut-to-brain axis. This is the communication pathway between the gut microbiota and the brain facilitated by the vagus nerve, and it is important in the neuronal reward pathway, which regulates motivational and emotional states. Activating the vagal gut-to-brain axis, which leads to dopamine release, suggests that modulating dopamine levels could be a potential treatment approach for dopamine-related disorders. Some examples of gut microbiota include Prevotella, Bacteroides, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Clostridium, Enterococcus, and Ruminococcus , and they can affect dopamine by modulating dopaminergic activity. These gut microbiota are able to produce neurotransmitters, including dopamine, and their functions and bioavailability in the central nervous system and periphery are influenced by the gut-brain axis. Gut dysbiosis is the disturbance of the healthy intestinal flora, and it can lead to dopamine-related disorders, including Parkinson's disease, ADHD, depression, anxiety, and autism. Gut microbes that produce butyrate, a short-chain fatty acid, positively impact dopamine and contribute to reducing symptoms and effects seen in neurodegenerative disorders. Dopamine as a treatment It is important to understand the link between dopamine and gut health, as this could provide information about new therapeutic targets and improve current methods that have been used to prevent and restore deficiencies in dopamine function in different disorders. Most cells in the immune system contain dopamine receptors, allowing processes such as antigen presentation, T-cell activation, and inflammation to be regulated. Further research into this could open up a new possibility for dopamine to be used as a medication to treat diseases by changing the activity of dopamine receptors. Therefore, dopamine is important in various physiological processes, both in the central nervous and immune systems. For example, studies have shown that schizophrenia can be treated with antipsychotic medications which target dopamine neurotransmission. In addition, schizophrenia has also been treated by targeting the dysregulation (decreasing the amount) of dopamine transmission. Studies have shown promising results regarding dopamine being used as a form of treatment. Nevertheless, further research is needed to understand the interactions between dopamine, motivation and gut health and explore how this knowledge can be used to create medications to treat conditions. Conclusion The bidirectional gut-brain connection shows the importance of gut microbiota in controlling dopamine levels. This connection influences mood and behaviour but also has the potential to lead to new and innovative dopamine-targeted treatments being developed (for conditions including dopamine-related disorders). For example, scientists could target and manipulate dopamine receptors in the immune system to regulate the above mentioned processes: antigen presentation, T-cell activation, and inflammation. While current research has shown some promising results, further investigations are needed to better comprehend the connection between gut health and dopamine levels. Nevertheless, through consistent studies, scientists can gain a deeper understanding of this mechanism to see how changes in gut microbiota could affect dopamine regulation and influence mood and behaviour. Written by Naoshin Haque Related articles: the gut microbiome / Crohn's disease Project Gallery How does moving houses impact your health and well-being? | Scientia News Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Pinterest Copy link How does moving houses impact your health and well-being? Evaluating the advantages and disadvantages of gentrification in the context of health Introduction According to the World Health Organization (WHO), health is “a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity". Another way to define health is an individual being in a condition of equilibrium within themselves and the surrounding environment, which includes their social interactions and other factors. Reflecting on historical views of health, ancient Indian and Chinese medicine and society in Ancient Greece thought of health as harmony between a person and their environment, which underlines the cohesion between the soul and body; this is similar to the WHO’s definition of health. Considering these ideas, one key determinant of health is gentrification (see Figure 1 ). It was first defined in 1964 by British sociologist Ruth Glass, who witnessed the dilapidated houses in the London Borough of Islington being taken over and renovated by middle-class proprietors. The broader consequences of gentrification include enhanced living conditions for the residents, differences in ownership prerequisites, increased prices of land and houses, and transformations in the social class structure. Also, these changes cause lower-income inhabitants to be pushed out or go to poorer neighbourhoods, and the conditions in these neighbourhoods, which can include racial separation, lead to inequities and discrepancies in health. For example, a systematic review discovered that elderly and Black residents were affected more by gentrification compared to younger and White citizens; this highlights the importance of support and interventions for specific populations during urban renewal. Given the knowledge provided above, this article will delve further into the advantages and disadvantages of gentrification in the context of health outcomes. Advantages of gentrification Gentrification does have its benefits. Firstly, it is positively linked with collective efficacy, which is about enhancing social cohesion within neighbourhoods and maintaining etiquette; this has health benefits for residents, like decreased rates of obesity, sexually transmitted diseases, and all-cause mortality. Another advantage of gentrification is the possibility of economic growth because as more affluent tenants move into specific neighbourhoods, they can bring companies, assets, and an increased demand for local goods and services, creating more jobs in the area for residents. Additionally, gentrification can be attributed to decreased crime rates in newly developed areas because the inflow of wealthier citizens often conveys a more substantial sense of community and investment in regional security standards. Therefore, this revitalised feeling of safety can make these neighbourhoods more appealing to existing and new inhabitants, which leads to further economic development. Moreover, reducing crime can improve health outcomes by reducing stress and anxiety levels among residents, for example. As a result, the community's general well-being can develop, leading to healthier lifestyle choices and more lively neighbourhoods. Furthermore, the longer a person lives in a gentrifying neighbourhood, the better their self-reported health, which does not differ by race or ethnicity, as observed in Los Angeles. Disadvantages of gentrification However, it is also essential to mention the drawbacks of gentrification, which are more numerous. In a qualitative study involving elderly participants, for example, one of them stated that, “The cost of living increases, but the money that people get by the end of the month is the same, this concerning those … even retired people, and people receiving the minimum wage, the minimum wage increases x every year, isn’t it? But it is not enough”. Elderly residents in Barcelona faced comparable challenges of residential displacement between 2011 and 2017 due to younger adults with higher incomes and those pursuing university education moving into the city. These cases spotlight how gentrification can raise the cost of living without an associated boost in earnings, making it problematic for people with lower incomes or vulnerable individuals to live in these areas. Likewise, a census from gentrified neighbourhoods in Pittsburgh showed that participants more typically conveyed negative health changes and reduced resources. Additionally, one study examined qualitative data from 14 cities in Europe and North America and commonly noticed that gentrification negatively affects the health of historically marginalised communities. These include threats to housing and monetary protection, socio-cultural expulsion, loss of services and conveniences, and raised chances of criminal behaviour and compromised public security. This can be equally observed during green gentrification, where longtime historically marginalised inhabitants feel excluded from green or natural spaces, and are less likely to use them compared to newer residents. To mitigate these negative impacts of gentrification, inclusive urban renewal guidelines should be drafted that consider vulnerable populations to boost health benefits through physical and social improvements. The first step would be to provide residents with enough information and establish trust between them and the local authorities because any inequality in providing social options dramatically affects people’s health-related behaviours. Intriguingly, gentrification has been shown to increase the opportunity for exposure to tick-borne pathogens by populations staying in place, displacement within urban areas, and suburban removal. This increases tick-borne disease risk, which poses a health hazard to impacted residents ( Figure 2 ). As for mental health, research has indicated that residing in gentrified areas is linked to greater levels of anxiety and depression in older adults and children. Additionally, one study found young people encountered spatial disconnection and affective exclusion due to gentrification and felt disoriented by the quickness of transition. Therefore, all of these problems associated with gentrification reveal that it can harm public health and well-being, aggravating disparities and creating feelings of isolation and aloneness in impacted communities. Conclusion Gentrification is a complicated and controversial approach that has noteworthy consequences for the health of neighbourhoods. Its advantages include enhanced infrastructure and boosted economic prospects, potentially leading to fairer access to healthcare services and improved health outcomes for residents. However, gentrification often leads to removal and the loss of affordable housing, which can harm the health of vulnerable populations. Therefore, it is vital for policymakers and stakeholders to carefully evaluate the likely health effects of gentrification and enforce alleviation strategies to safeguard the well-being of all citizens (see Table 1 ). Written by Sam Jarada Related article: A perspective on well-being REFERENCES WHO. Health and Well-Being. Who.int . 2015. Available from: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/major-themes/health-and-well-being Sartorius N. The meanings of health and its promotion. Croatian Medical Journal. 2006;47(4):662–4. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2080455/ Krahn GL, Robinson A, Murray AJ, Havercamp SM, Havercamp S, Andridge R, et al. It’s time to Reconsider How We Define Health: Perspective from disability and chronic condition. Disability and Health Journal. 2021 Jun;14(4):101129. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936657421000753 Svalastog AL, Donev D, Jahren Kristoffersen N, Gajović S. Concepts and Definitions of Health and health-related Values in the Knowledge Landscapes of the Digital Society. Croatian Medical Journal. 2017 Dec;58(6):431–5. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5778676/ Foryś I. Gentrification on the Example of Suburban Parts of the Szczecin Urban Agglomeration. remav. 2013 Sep 1;21(3):5–14. Uribe-Toril J, Ruiz-Real J, de Pablo Valenciano J. Gentrification as an Emerging Source of Environmental Research. Sustainability. 2018 Dec 19;10(12):4847. Schnake-Mahl AS, Jahn JL, Subramanian SV, Waters MC, Arcaya M. Gentrification, Neighborhood Change, and Population Health: a Systematic Review. Journal of Urban Health. 2020 Jan 14;97(1):1–25. Project Gallery The chemistry of an atomic bomb | Scientia News Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Pinterest Copy link The chemistry of an atomic bomb Julius Oppenheimer Julius Robert Oppenheimer, often credited with leading the development of the atomic bomb, played a significant role in its creation in the early 1940s. However, it is essential to recognize the collaborative effort of many scientists, engineers, and researchers who contributed to the project. The history and chemistry of the atomic bomb are indeed fascinating, shedding light on the scientific advancements that made it possible. The destructive power of an atomic bomb stems from the rapid release of energy resulting from the splitting, or fission, of fissile atomic nuclei in its core. Isotopes such as uranium-235 and plutonium-239 are selected for their ability to undergo fission readily and sustain a self-sustaining chain reaction, leading to the release of an immense amount of energy. The critical mass of fissionable material required for detonation ensures that the neutrons produced during fission have a high probability of impacting other nuclei and initiating a chain reaction. To facilitate a controlled release of energy, neutron moderation plays a crucial role in the functioning of an atomic bomb. Neutrons emitted during fission have high velocities, making them less likely to be absorbed by other fissile material. However, by employing a moderator material such as heavy water (deuterium oxide) or graphite, these high-speed neutrons can be slowed down. Slowing down the neutrons increases the likelihood of their absorption by fissile material, enhancing the efficiency of the chain reaction and the release of energy. The sheer magnitude of the energy released by atomic bombs is staggering. For example, one kilogram (2.2 pounds) of uranium-235 can undergo complete fission, producing an amount of energy equivalent to that released by 17,000 tons (17 kilotons) of TNT. This tremendous release of energy underscores the immense destructive potential of atomic weapons. It is essential to note that the development of the atomic bomb represents a confluence of scientific knowledge and technological advancements, with nuclear chemistry serving as a foundational principle. The understanding of nuclear fission, the critical mass requirement, and the implosion design were key factors in the creation of the atomic bomb. Exploring the chemistry behind this devastating weapon not only provides insights into the destructive capabilities of atomic energy but also emphasises the responsibility that accompanies its use. In conclusion, while Oppenheimer's contributions to the development of the atomic bomb are significant, it is crucial to acknowledge the collective effort that led to its creation. The chemistry behind atomic bombs, from the selection of fissile isotopes to neutron moderation, plays a pivotal role in harnessing the destructive power of nuclear fission. Understanding the chemistry of atomic weapons highlights the remarkable scientific achievements and reinforces the need for responsible use of atomic energy. By Navnidhi Sharma Project Gallery View All Forum Posts (19) Quizzes #3 In Questions & Answers · 15 February 2023 Form of energy which is due to an object/ particle's motion? A. Kinetic energy B. Gravitational potential energy C. Potential energy D. Thermal energy 0 1 16 Quizzes #5 In Questions & Answers · 4 March 2023 0 1 22 Forum rules In General Discussion · 13 December 2022 We want everyone to get the most out of this community, so we ask that you please read and follow these guidelines: Respect each other Keep posts relevant to the forum topic No spamming 1 0 6 View All

There’s Nothing Here... We can’t find the page you’re looking for. Check the URL, or head back home. Go Home

There’s Nothing Here... We can’t find the page you’re looking for. Check the URL, or head back home. Go Home